‘Changing Ireland’ interviewed Minister Pat Carey yesterday on a range of topics, including a key question over changing structures for State support for communities within the framework of the Local and Community Development Programme.
A lot of people had pinned hopes on the new Minister taking fully on board proposals coming from the ground up and initial comments by the Minister at events in Cork and Kerry recently were promising.
Many voluntary boards of Community Development Projects and some Partnership companies were hoping he would give the ‘ok’ for Service Level Agreements (SLA) between CDPs and other agencies. It would have meant that staff could remain employed by the same board of local volunteers and would not have to transfer to join the staff of the larger Partnership companies.
However, while the Minister didn’t rule out SLAs entirely, he yesterday said each proposal would be judged on its own merits, area-by-area.
Two SLA proposals involving roughly a dozen projects in both Limerick city and Cork city and county have already been accepted.
However, communities in Galway, Youghal, Tipperary and Donegal (among others) have had SLA proposals rejected.
And nationally, the Minister yesterday rejected the idea of allowing CDPs countrywide to enter into SLAs, as proposed by the National Community Development Forum.
The deadline for submitting ‘integration plans’ or alternatives proposals is officially tomorrow, June 30th. However, the Minister has left the door ajar, just about.
Here’s how he handled the question over SLAs. The interviewer was Allen Meagher:
Interviewer: The Service Level Agreement model has been pushed by a good number of CDPs and by the National Community Development Forum. Is that something that you view favourably?
Minister: It could work in some circumstances but not in all.
Interviewer: Can you explain what those circumstances are?
Minister: No, because.. (cut off by interviewer).
Interviewer: I know Cumann na nDaoine CDP in Youghal put in a proposal.
Minister: If you’re talking about one size fits all, what might apply in A-Community might not apply in B-Community.
…I’m not prepared to say here and now ‘yeah, that’ll be grand’. It’s going down to the one size fits all.
Interviewer: Your officials have rejected most SLA proposals to date (apart from the Limerick model and the Cork model). Might one be accepted in the future?
Minister: It’s possible yes.
Interviewer: There’s a June 30th deadline. This interview is taking place 2 days before that deadline. Are you willing to extend that deadline?
Minister: No, I need some clarity about where we’re going to go.
Interviewer: If somebody did come along next week and proposed (an alternative) would it be too late?
Minister: We can apply injury time.
OTHER QUESTIONS WE PUT TO THE MINISTER INCLUDED:
1) Are special arrangements being made for Traveller CDPs and for Women’s CDPs?
2) Are FRCs next in line for absorption into the Local and Community Development Programme?
3) What hopes has the Minister for his new and stronger Department?
4) Will the Minister accept that the cuts to the Community Sector are disproportionate, as a report by Brian Harvey suggests? The story was the page one lead in yesterday’s Irish Examiner.
5) What’s the story on support for community groups on the ground in inner-city Dublin where the Dublin Inner City Partnership has been closed down?
6) Relating to Shell’s work in North Mayo, had the Minister a view on the imprisonment of campaigner and trawler fisherman Pat O’Donnell?
7) We also asked the Minister about the role of the Centre for Effective Services.
MORE IN OUR NEXT BLOG ENTRY… TOMORROW.
AND THE FULL INTERVIEW WILL BE PUBLISHED IN OUR NEXT PRINT EDITION OF ‘CHANGING IRELAND’, DUE OUT LATER THIS MONTH.
COMMENTS WELCOME (click on 'Comments' below here)!
PERSONAL ABUSE IS A NO-NO. PRAISE, COMMENT AND CRITICISM OF POLICY OR APPROACH IS COOL. GIVE YOUR NAME IF POSSIBLE, OR CLICK THE ‘ANONYMOUS’ KEY.
More confusion, has anyone in this Government, or should I say Regime, have any level of clarity??
ReplyDeleteHi
ReplyDeleteI was just reading minister Pat Cary’s interview with Changing Ireland.
The Minister says in relation to the service level agreement put forward by the CDP National Forum. If you’re talking about one size fits all, what might apply in one Community might not apply in Another Community. Is that not a contradiction in itself? As the national Community development forum had a mandate from all the CDP’s it represent’s that this proposal would work for them. Community Development project works because of consultion and process. To have a workable agreement this needs to happen with the Minister and his Department and to date no effort has been made to ensure this can happen.
These valuable Projects are being bullied into signing agreements today that will stiffle the work they do and strip them of asset they have built up over the last twenty years. In this present climate of high unemployment most of these projects are dealing with higher volumes of People and less funds and compounding this additional pressure on having to fight the Department for the right to exist
Regards
A Concerned Community Volunteer and Worker
more pain for communities under pressure, total disregard for our knowledge and expertise the fools will loose out unfortunatley so will the most vunerable and marginalised
ReplyDeleteMargaret O'Shea
Kcnpwdi
I'm so disappointed to find out about this through Changing Ireland, rather than directly from the Department. I feel that although the Dept says that they are open to looking at new models, it is difficult to find out what models have been accepted and rejected and the criteria for this. Why has the NCDF proposal been rejected?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Minister Carey that a one size fits all approach might not work in every community and nowhere is that more evident than with the proposed full transfer model. This will not allow for meaningful community development work to occur in every community.
Maria McHale, Louisburgh CDP
Our chief job is to highlight good community work carried out on the ground by companies funded through the Local and Community Development Programme, to promote the Programme's achievements once it becomes established. We are also here to cover issues as they arise, to ask questions and get information out when we have it.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteREMINDER - WE DON'T MODERATE COMMENTS IN ADVANCE, BUT DO URGE THE FOLLOWING. BASICALLY, USE YOUR HEAD:
ReplyDeletePERSONAL ABUSE IS A NO-NO. PRAISE, COMMENT AND CRITICISM OF POLICY OR APPROACH IS COOL. GIVE YOUR NAME IF POSSIBLE, OR CLICK THE ‘ANONYMOUS’ KEY.